Archive for February, 2008
what’s being built
MAIN GALLERY
One ecology or autopoietic system, with multiple strata:
Aerial cell sculpture system
Patrick concept
++ lots of creators:
Manitoba: Gregory, Candace, Dirk, Evan;
TML: JC, Michael, JS, Flower;
Calligraphic video
concept, design, implementation
JS
Marine, understudy for Touch2
Jerome, extra for Touch2
Soundfield
acquisition
analysis, synthesis
sound design, implementation
Tim
Lightfield: moving beam, St Catherine wall
concept, design, implementation
Harry
Media choreography
Xin Wei, composition, design of feature extraction, mapping
Morgan, implementation tracking, state engine
Mani - advisor on state engine
St CATHERINE WINDOW & VITRINE
Plants, biotics
concept, design, implementation
Flower
BLACKBOX Sculpture pieces
Lenka, monofilament + cast glass cone sculpture, study for larger work
Elena, mixed media sculpture, TML box
VITRINE
Louis-Andre, lead designer
Tim, sound installation
JS, robotic projection?Flower, thread + LED sculpture, study ?
Ludwig, gear
JC, JA? print production
Valerie? advisor
EVENT
TOUCH2
Soo, choreography
Soo, Kiani, dancers
JA, set design, construction
Marine, Jerome set construction (costume / wall treatement + projector mounts)
Marine, assistant Jitter instrumentalist
Jerome, live video instrument
JS, Jitter instrument design
Desh, video, projection (edited from Touch1)
Harry, lighting, projection advice
Ludwig, event design
VERNISSAGE
(Josee-Anne) ?
Documentation
Ludwig, video
JC, still ? video
Valerie, editor, exhibition cards
JA, TML brochure
Louis-Andre, vitrine display
+ assistants
Publicity
Elena, electronic
Posters, flyers?
Overall concept
Xin Wei, Director, curator
drawings of cells by Patrick
See Patrick’s drawings of cells now in the TML Galleries / album “cells” –particularly the suspension side image:
How to upload & embed images
You need to click on TML Gallery to upload images, before Meta / Admin to Write a Post. In Write a Post, position cursor where you want the image to be embedded, then click on the “G2″ Gallery Images button
(lime green, extreme right of Post toolbar).
In the Gallery, be sure to select an Insertion Option like “Fullsize image with link to Gallery page for image (HTML).” before you click Insert so an image or icon will appear inline in the body of your post.
Dummy Engine + OSC
In reference to Osc names:
The proposed OSC naming convention is:
/rt/clock/time/seconds [1,2,3…n]
/rt/clock/time/minutes [1,2,3…n]
/rt/clock/time/hours [1,2,3…n]
…
/rt/clock/time {s,m,h…}
/rt/clock/env/seconds [0.0,1.0]
/rt/clock/env/minutes [0.0,1.0]
/rt/clock/env/hours [0.0,1.0]
…
/rt/clock/env {s,m,h…}
Each clock drives its own breakpoint envelope, thus ‘env’. This means everybody has access both to elapsed time and to the current state of the envelope (defined by a breakpoint editor). Using envelope data (instead of elapsed-time) may make clock-dependent changes more globally coherent.
/rt/state/breath {nobody,inside,outside}
/rt/state/breath/nobody n
/rt/state/breath/inside n
/rt/state/breath/outside n
/rt/state/breath/mob n
/rt/state/visit {nightlife,daydream…desert}
/rt/state/visit/nightlife n
/rt/state/visit/daydream n
/rt/state/visit/firestorm n
/rt/state/visit/glass n
/rt/state/visit/desert n
where n is [0.0,1.0]
/rt/state/calibration [0 or 1]
/rt/state/dummy [1,2,3,4…n]
/rt/state/dummy/1 [0.0,1.0]
/rt/state/dummy/2 [0.0,1.0]
/rt/state/dummy/3 [0.0,1.0]
/rt/state/dummy/4 [0.0,1.0]
…
/rt/state/dummy/n [0.0,1.0]
The dummy patch (tml.pro.rt.dummy) is currently running on Miniserver. (Dummy OSC values are being sent to Tim’s computer (10.0.0.12), but I need IP’s for anybody else (JS) who wants data.)
The dummy patch consists of 4 sinusoidal oscillators driven by metros+counters (max = 6283), so period = ms*6283.
1 = sin(x1)
2 = 1-sin(x1)
3 = cos(x2) (Remember: not necessarily 180º out of phase, x2 is independent)
4 = sin(x3)
5 = cos(x4)
I’ve also added a patch called tml.pro.rt.util.dummyrate (in the util folder) that you can use to remotely change the rate of any oscillator.
Touch2: vernissage event, opening tableau; wearable architecture
Hi Soo, Kiani, Josée-Anne,
What do you think of this as the beginning: The idea would be that Touch2 picks up where Touch1 ends, in an indirect way, In fact we could project the Desh’s video onto the Atrium wall right up to the point where we see Kiani’ facing the camera, fading.
What if the way we open Touch2 is to have Soo, the one who emerges from the womb (in Touch1) emerge from the Atrium wall in the following way. I imagined that the emergent dancer (Soo) would, initially be covered in a very large film of tissue paper wheatpasted to the wall, so that her body is behind of a continuous sheet of very thin translucent fibrous material following the contours of her body and blending into the rest of the wall. (Josee-Anne, Harry gave precise ideas of how to make this. He and I think it is eminently buildable. We will always make it breathable, and as comfy as possible! Of course we have to see what Soo and Kiani think ![]()
Soo’s initial pose could be a frozen moment of a movement of escape, emergence. Kiani initially would be offstage (ready to enter from the blackbox gallery). Desh’s video could be projected over Soo’s body-as-part-of-wall-as-screen.
At a given moment, (say the end of the video), Soo would emerge out of the tissue paper wall, bursting through the layers of tissue paper,
(EXFOLIATION is one of the themes of Remedios.)
The sound could be quite strong bc paper is stiff. I imagined with Harry that we could prepare this as a “costume” in the form of a sandwich of a cardboard back and tissue paper at least 8′ x 8′…. It is important not to read as clothing, but as “wall”. The edges of this would have to be dressed to make flush with the actual wall.
Obviously we would pre-assemble of sandwich, complete with pre-drilled holes in the wall for attachment of the sandwich to the wall, and store the assembly somewhere in the Gallery together fast-drying plaster-water mix ready for rapid assembly minimum time before showtime. That time is the time of comfortable wear for the Dancer, of course. We must figure out a way to rapidly assembly, and dress the set+costume, before — but not much before — the vernissage starts.
After this event, we could paint over the eruption “scar” so that it simultaneously remains as evidence of the event, and can hold projected image, so subsequent Jitter imagery would pick up the traces of the physical peeling layers of the exfoliation. (Thanks to Harry.)
Cheers,
Xin Wei
On 19-Feb-08, at 3:43 AM, Josée-Anne wrote:
I saw Kiani on Sunday and we talked about it. That’s cool! She’s interested.
I need to check with the Gallery director tomorrow and see if we can cut into on of the Gallery’s walls.
JS, we would probably want to to project Desh’s film first and at the end (shortly before the dancers emerge from the wall) move-on to the one of the patches that you have been using to do it. Would that be something possible?
XW I’m back at the drawing board on this. Now trying to put together the paper and what I showed you before… did you have sketches for this as well? Or an event design.
Talk with Harry re specific construction ideas, and bring back notes. Then we can enroll production help. I would say Marine Antony.
I’m also wondering, Soo, if you think the movement should be centered on/close-to the floor or not. (Vertical crack - like the Remedios paintings or Horizontal-on the floor to accommodate Touch-like movements…)
Whatever the movement — Touch, as Soo and Kiani know, is concerned with the ethical medium in-between bodies.
See the forwarded email re Aristophanes below.
Touch2 indirectly (NOT literally) follows after the emergence event in Touch1.
Could we schedule a meeting towards the end of the week, as things get better defined.
Thanks.
Bye.
On Feb 19, 2008 3:00 AM, SOO <chohansoo@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jo,
Yeah!
I asked Kiani and she would be available as well for the event. If you want, we can set a schedule to talk about it more specific.
Soo
On Feb 17, 2008 9:36 PM, Josée-Anne <joseeanne@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I’d like to work with the Touch team (and possibly JS) on costumes and a temporary installation for the video-movement performance event Touch2. If there is time/interest.
I thought that Touch2 was part of the vernissage event? any updates regarding this? What do people think, together, separate, beginning, middle, end…
On the calendar we have the opening on Monday the 17th. What about the other event(s)?
Reminder: 3 Weeks before setup, 4 Weeks before opening.
On Feb 16, 2008 10:30 AM, x w <shaxinwei@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Among those of you who are not already committed to one of the
productions, would one of you be able to take charge of managing the
events: the vernissage, the possible performances (Touch2 and Sebald3) ?
Xin Wei
Begin forwarded message:
From: x w <shaxinwei@gmail.com>
Date: January 27, 2008 1:07:05 PM EST (CA)
To: sutton Timothy <tim@synthist.net>, Jean-Sébastien Rousseau <jsrousseau@gmail.com>, Morgan Sutherland <morgan@morgansutherland.net>, Ludwig Manahan <vjmoots@gmail.com>, Soo-yeon Cho <chohansoo@gmail.com>, Marine Antony <marine.antony@gmail.com>, desh Fernando <nacando@gmail.com>
Subject: Aristophanes on love; and going beyond Aristophanes
Hi Touch Folks,
People have made excellent work preparing for the shoot. So we’re almost there. This is a good moment to take stock of where we are in spirit….
In Plato’s Symposium, Aristophanes presented a history of sexed love, based on Zeus splitting the atom of round, primeval man. In the beginning, man-woman were powerful, spherical creatures, with four legs and four arms. But for their arrogance, Zeus split them into halves that Apollo healed and shaped into the sexed bodies we have today. Doomed to seek our other halves.
I’m augmenting this myth by de-emphasizing the human organisms and foregrounding the medium of tissue and the liquid plenum of the world. So the effects we’ll see from the live video process will make palpable the
0. the single composite body (only light, some moments of delay)
1, the bodies internal forces (textures — only within the bodies)
2. the forces between the bodies (with bodies in black silhouette)
3. the forces suffusing everything - the bodies as well as the space exterior to the bodies.
How the visual dynamics work is up to JS. The staging of the different swirling video textures as the event unfolds step by step, should suggest that:
1. ethical relations are mediated by tissue (substance, not formal grammar of a moving part of body);
2. the very fabric of space itself is a medium (not just body tissue).
So the “womb” is merely a context for a dramatic event of “birth” but we don’t have to over emphasize the womb (too clichéd, and too over-coded with expectations). But the birth event itself is the moment at which the sound connotes to much huger space, and more clarified voices — as Tim has been suggesting — and when the video textures display the delayed forces / tensions built up from the earlier activity between the two separated halves — Soo and Kiani.
Compliments to all of you,
Xin Wei
514-817-3505
sketches of plan + elevation, main gallery
I’ve sketched some ideas on the layout of the main gallery, capturing some of the discussions with Patrick, Harry, JA, Tim…. (Also had conversations with Flower, Lenka, Elena for the blackbox, and Louis-Andre, Elena, Tim, … not represented in these sketches.)
Waiting on other folks.
The idea is to cluster the head-height cells near the corridor side of the space, leaving a scattering of them in the central area. Harry suggested bouncing the ceiling projection from a suspended projector (2m from grid), off of a 2m wide mylar, for effective throw of 6m. JS should confirm with Harry & Patrick+JC whether this would yield enough coverage of image-bearing cells on the ceiling.
Perhaps the Weaving (20′ x 4′ Sensate Tapestry) could be suspended from the ceiling near the entrance to the Gallery. (Marguerite and Elliot can confer with Patrick et.
Currently, I’m assuming that JS projections go onto the walls, eg the Atrium, ceiling, and Mackay walls (if we can fit the Sensate Tapestry parallel to the short wall on the corridor side of the Gallery). Need to confirm this.
Spoke with Harry re. Lightfield. Current idea: one good place to mount the moving beam (light) would be near the grid, about 1m out from the center axis of the Atrium wall. Its beam should have a clear play over the floor, over the bench. It may (or may not) scatter through a few carefully placed, transparent, head-height cells that “trickle” into the main air space.
The other lightfield installatio, along the base of the St. Catherine wall, would work best if that wall is left blank, I think. We could project from a projector suspended from the grid flush with wall, beaming down to a 3.7m wide x 5 cm high image-bearing custom-made screen / reflective surface. The point of that projection is to transmit and transmute (perhaps contrapuntally) the activity from the sidewalk. (We can mount a web-camera atop the St Catherine wall, looking out to the sidewalk, and process it through a simple Jitter patch.)
The main atmosphere effects: I’ve been emailing / talking with JS, Tim, Morgan about the states of the room. Now I have some semantics for the VISIT topology; it can be a fusion of season and weather: spring (EXFOLIATION), summer (verdant), fall (FIRESTORM), winter (GLASS stillness).
Comments(0)